A mad scientist covers disruptive technologies, subversive methods, and how things go wrong.
Showing posts with label weapons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weapons. Show all posts
Wednesday, 27 November 2013
Heterotechnology: Improvised Weapons
In recent news, there is a man who assembles guns, explosives, and other weapons from items beyond airport security. Of interest was the fact basic chemistry is used for an explosive charge, by combining water and lithium. While this differs from conventional black powder and propellants, it is still the use an explosive reaction to propel a projectile. As new security measures arise, so to do new ways around them. A better pro-active response may seek to discourage certain types of behavior (such as attention seeking and denial of infamy) than bans on toenail clippers.
Thursday, 19 September 2013
Unintended Consequences
Unintended consequences as a result of technological advancement is practically a cliche. However, sometimes, the realm of mad science advances just because a technology turns out to be impractical. An idea for a riot control weapon, allegedly able to produce sound effects, would just fry the brain of whoever it was aimed at. One wonders what could possibly go wrong.
Friday, 24 May 2013
The Spectacle of Violence
While the events involving a stabbing attack on a British soldier in London are still shrouded in uncertainty, possible revenge attacks have also started. The grisly spectacle has quickly devolved into a violence-porn media chasing every possible rumor or story. Whether the attackers had some religious or political motive or merely were apolitical attention seeking sociopaths, I do not know. This does, however, illustrate one of the darker points of the current media cycle.
Compared to the USA, the city of London has become a virtual police state (although the Americans are rapidly changing that). There are CCTV cameras everywhere, privatized police/security, and strict gun (and other weapon) control laws. Despite all of these 'precautions,' a mad slasher with a knife and one unlucky victim managed to provoke such a media reaction (and public backlash). A grim "return on investment" for the price of a cheap blade would be millions of pounds worth of police/security/media coverage of such an event that feeds upon itself as the frenzy builds.
For all the fuss about an inaccurate, exploding 3D printed gun in recent times, the knife attack serves to remind that the equipment for disruptive actions (including violent ones) is rarely far outside one's own kitchen. Even with development of 3D printers, firearms, and ad hoc explosives vanish from the earth, a single edged weapon can still stand as an assassin's weapon, as it has for the sum total of human history. Why should the future be different?
Compared to the USA, the city of London has become a virtual police state (although the Americans are rapidly changing that). There are CCTV cameras everywhere, privatized police/security, and strict gun (and other weapon) control laws. Despite all of these 'precautions,' a mad slasher with a knife and one unlucky victim managed to provoke such a media reaction (and public backlash). A grim "return on investment" for the price of a cheap blade would be millions of pounds worth of police/security/media coverage of such an event that feeds upon itself as the frenzy builds.
For all the fuss about an inaccurate, exploding 3D printed gun in recent times, the knife attack serves to remind that the equipment for disruptive actions (including violent ones) is rarely far outside one's own kitchen. Even with development of 3D printers, firearms, and ad hoc explosives vanish from the earth, a single edged weapon can still stand as an assassin's weapon, as it has for the sum total of human history. Why should the future be different?
Saturday, 9 March 2013
Mad Science at Home
There is a number of topics I could address this week, such
as the food scandal in Europe, the spread of drones in the USA, or the rumblings
of a genuine supervillain state in North Korea. However, the creation of mad
science innovations at home is only beginning compared to what it may become
despite (or perhaps because of) government laws. Death rays may join homemade
firearms and explosives as weapons of mad scientists. Perhaps drones may be the
new guns, in the sense of a disruptive technology everyone rushes to ban. Given
the vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure and possibilities of destructive
drone swarms, protection will be extremely difficult, if not impossible. Tomorrow's
"terrorists" may lack ideology or cause, save destroying something
and seeing what happens. The instability of the current world system becomes
even more strained as a result. What could possibly go wrong?
Sunday, 24 February 2013
Relevant Technologies
Some weapons technologies reaching maturity (especially the laser injections). Get to it, mad scientists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)